Time & Work
🔒 Log in to trackMen–Days–Hours Chain & Provisions
🔒 Log in to trackWork is the product of every resource: (men, days, hours/day, efficiency).
Same work ⇒ equal products: . More men ⇒ fewer days (inverse proportion).
Provisions problems: stock = men × days. After t days, remaining stock feeds the new headcount: .
Consumption questions (garrison, fodder, food stores) are men-days problems in disguise.
Detailed notes
Work as a product of resources
The same job can be finished by many men in few days or few men in many days. The bridge between the two situations is that the total work stays the same, and total work is the product of every resource: (men × days × hours per day × efficiency). Equating the products of two situations: For the same work, drop the W's. Quantities that grow with days (men, hours, efficiency) sit beside M; write the missing quantity last and solve. 18 men × 25 days = 450 man-days; with 30 men, days. More men → fewer days: men and days are inversely proportional.
Hours per day in the chain
12 men working 8 hours a day finish in 15 days: work man-hours. How long for 18 men at 10 hours a day? days. Hours behave exactly like days — more hours a day, fewer days needed.
Provisions (garrison, hostel, fodder)
A stock of food "for M men for D days" is man-days of food. After t days the stock left is man-days, to be shared by the new headcount: 400 men have food for 25 days; after 5 days 100 more men arrive → stock left man-days ÷ 500 = 16 days. If men leave instead, the headcount drops and the stock lasts longer. If nobody joins or leaves, the remaining days are simply .
Work left after some days / reinforcement mid-work
Convert the whole job into man-days first. 60 men need 40 days → job = 2400 man-days. After 10 days they have done 600, leaving 1800 for the new team. If 10 men leave, the remaining 50 need days more. Always apply the chain to the remaining work, never to the whole job again.
Men, women and boys (efficiency equivalence)
"3 men or 5 women can do a work in 12 days" pins the unit rates: one man does per day, one woman per day. Any team can then be priced: 6 men + 5 women per day → 4 days. Read "or" as "the two teams are equally big in work terms".
Efficiency inside the chain
If one person is twice as efficient, count him as 2 men. A team of 3 men and 2 boys, where a man = 2 boys, is boy-units. Converting everyone to one standard unit before multiplying avoids all confusion.
Common traps
- Writing more men in the numerator (more men → FEWER days).
- Forgetting to subtract the elapsed days from the provisions.
- Applying the chain to the full job instead of the remaining job.
- Counting a man's efficiency twice — E enters the product once.
Quick revision
- for the same work.
- Provisions: stock man-days ÷ new headcount.
- Mid-work: remaining work = total − (rate × days gone).
- Equivalence: rate of one man = ; price every team this way.
- Sanity: more men / more hours / higher efficiency → fewer days.
Types of questions asked
Every way this subtopic shows up in exams — how to recognise it, the formula or logic to use, and a solved example.
Type 1: Men–days–hours chainvery common3 practice Q
One scenario of men, days and (maybe) hours per day is given; a second scenario changes some of them and one value is asked.
- Compute the work as for the given scenario.
- Divide by the new men, hours and efficiency.
- Everything that grows with time stays on the left; the unknown lands alone.
Why: the total job is a fixed number of man-hours, so the two products must be equal.
Example: If 12 men working 8 hours a day can complete a work in 15 days, in how many days will 18 men working 10 hours a day complete it?
man-hours; days.
Type 2: Provisions of a garrison / hostelvery common2 practice Q
Food or fodder for M men for D days; after t days some men join or leave; how much longer the stock lasts is asked.
- Stock consumed per day = M units; total stock man-days.
- After t days, stock left .
- Divide by the new headcount for the number of remaining days.
Why: each man eats one unit a day, so the stock is simply a number of man-days.
Example: A garrison of 400 men has provisions for 25 days. After 5 days, 100 more men join. The provisions will now last:
Stock left man-days → days.
Type 3: Reinforcement / men leaving mid-workcommon2 practice Q
A team works for some days, then men join or leave; the extra days needed for the remaining work are asked.
- Whole job in man-days = M × D.
- Subtract the man-days already done (M × days worked).
- Divide the remainder by the new number of men.
Why: only the unfinished man-days remain to be shared among whoever is still on the job.
Example: 60 men can complete a piece of work in 40 days. They work for 10 days, after which 10 men leave. In how many days will the remaining work be completed?
Job man-days; done ; left for 50 men → days.
Type 4: Men ↔ women ↔ boys equivalencecommon2 practice Q
'3 men or 5 women can do a work in 12 days' — a mixed team of men and women (or boys) is asked about.
- From each 'or' statement, write the rate of one person: .
- Price the asked team as a sum of unit rates.
- Invert for the days.
Why: '3 men or 5 women in 12 days' means the two teams do equal work per day, fixing both unit rates.
Example: If 3 men or 5 women can do a piece of work in 12 days, in how many days will 6 men and 5 women together do it?
1 man: /day; 1 woman: /day. Team rate → 4 days.
Formulas
Shortcut tricks
⚡ Multiply resources, equate products
Everything inverse-proportional lands in the numerator; direct-proportional in the denominator.
Example: 15 men complete a work in 20 days. In how many days will 25 men complete the same work?
⇒ days.
⚡ Provisions after reinforcement
Stock left = original men × days left; then divide by the new headcount.
Example: A garrison of 500 men has provisions for 27 days. After 3 days, 300 more men join. The provisions will now last:
Stock left man-days ⇒ days.
⚡ Work left after a share is done
First find what fraction remains, then apply men-days to that remainder.
Example: 45 men start a job they would finish in 16 days. After 4 days, 36 more men join. The remaining work now takes:
Left days.
Where students lose marks
Putting more men in the numerator of the chain equation (more men ⇒ fewer days ⇒ denominator).
Forgetting to subtract elapsed days in provisions problems.
Counting efficiency twice — E belongs inside the product once.
Applying men-days to the whole work instead of the remaining work.
Practice sets — 12 questions
Sets of 10, mixed across the question types above. Each answer comes with a step-by-step explanation.
Topic test · 12 questions
Suggested time 8 min · wrong answers go to your mistake notebook automatically.